Mission
Advance sovereign AI infrastructure where every inference is auditable, every upgrade is accountable, and every treasury allocation is traceable on-chain.
Every inference proven. Every model auditable. Every computation trusted.
Aethelred governance is built to avoid capture. Token holders and validator operators each hold constitutional weight, with both chambers required for protocol changes. Treasury actions are timelocked, audited, and milestone gated, with economic parameters linked back to the token framework and ecosystem participation flowing through the community channels.
Operating under the ADGM DLT Foundation framework, Aethelred governs for cryptographic verifiability, neutrality, and long-term protocol resilience rather than short-term speculation.
Advance sovereign AI infrastructure where every inference is auditable, every upgrade is accountable, and every treasury allocation is traceable on-chain.
Every inference proven. Every model auditable. Every computation trusted.
Establish trust in computation as a protocol guarantee, enabling regulated industries to deploy AI with transparent cryptographic assurance.
Formal proposals move through a staged pipeline from discussion to enforceable on-chain execution.
Authors publish an AIP draft with rationale, technical impact, and migration strategy.
Legal, security, and economic impact checks are completed before chamber voting.
House of Tokens and House of Validators each vote independently to supermajority.
Approved proposals enter mandatory timelock before governed smart contract execution.
Economic stakeholders and infrastructure operators must both approve core protocol changes.
Represents AETHEL stakers with proportional voting rights. Focus areas include economic policy, treasury deployment, and ecosystem incentives.
Represents active TEE node operators with equal-seat voting, protecting network safety and operational continuity.
Every constitutional or protocol-level proposal requires independent 67% approval in both houses. Single-chamber passage is insufficient.
The senate governs core protocol levers while preserving execution safeguards.
Consensus parameters, cryptographic policies, and precompile activation.
Ecosystem grants, R&D funding, and strategic infrastructure investments.
Circuit breaker policy and emergency multi-sig operations via geographically isolated key holders (UAE, Switzerland, Singapore, UK).
Jurisdiction routing rules, attestation requirements, and reporting standards.
Allocation schedules, reserve controls, and token release parameter governance.
AIP framework updates and community participation criteria.
Funding is released against deliverables with 2% TGE unlock, 6-month cliff, and 48-month linear vesting under governance oversight.
Healthcare, finance, logistics, and enterprise automation built on attestable compute.
SDKs, CLI workflows, explorers, and model registry infrastructure.
PQC hardening, enclave verification techniques, and audit instrumentation.
Current and recently completed proposals in the bi-cameral pipeline.
| Proposal | Status | House of Tokens | House of Validators | Target window |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIP-021: PQC key rotation policy upgrade | Voting | 71% yes | 69% yes | Q2 2026 |
| AIP-024: Enterprise jurisdiction corridor expansion | Committee review | Pending | Pending | Q2 2026 |
| AIP-018: Grants tranche for confidential inference tooling | Timelock | 82% yes | 74% yes | Execution in 4 days |
Institutional control requirements are enforced at consensus and orchestration layers.
Compute jobs strictly route through approved regional hardware, such as the Stargate UAE AI data centers.
KYC/AML and OFAC attestations can be bound to workload settlement trails.
Proposal, treasury, and execution records are permanently queryable on-chain.
AIPs are the formal governance mechanism for protocol changes, standards, and treasury policy.
Initial proposal and technical rationale.
Public feedback and refinement cycle.
Dual chamber voting and supermajority checks.
Timelock completion and on-chain implementation.
Any AETHEL holder can contribute to policy direction through forum and on-chain voting workflows.
Use MetaMask, Ledger, or EVM-compatible wallet tied to staked AETHEL.
Study impact assessments, parameter diffs, and implementation plans.
Cast direct votes or delegate to trusted policy representatives.
| Lock duration | Multiplier | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 90 days | 1.0x | Base governance participation |
| 180 days | 1.25x | Mid-term commitment incentive |
| 365 days | 1.6x | Long-horizon policy alignment |
| 730 days | 2.0x | Constitutional governance influence |